نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی مستقل
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده، حقوق، الهیات و علوم سیاسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 استادیار، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، واحد کرمانشاه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمانشاه، ایران.
3 دانشیار، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده، حقوق، الهیات و علوم سیاسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
4 دانشیار، گروه علوم سیاسی و مطالعات انقلاب اسلامی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
This article focuses on the cause of Iran's political underdevelopment during the second Pahlavi era and argues that the main obstacle to political development in Iran during Pahlavi era was the absence of institutions in the social structure of and the lack of institutional thinking among the political authority forces, including the National Front, the Tudeh Party, the Islamists, and the court. The authoritarianism of the political system, political culture, geopolitical obstacles, the refusal of thought, and the dominance of ideology are among the theoretical tools that thinkers in the field of development have tried to use to explain the problem of Iran's political underdevelopment, each in turn, and in light of that, to unravel a knot in the closed work of development in Iran. In contrast to the aforementioned tools, the present article, by applying Douglas North's institutionalist theoretical framework, concluded that in Iran during the second Pahlavi era, the necessary theoretical and practical possibilities for the institutional distribution of power among forces that had the capacity to create violence were not created, and as a result, in the absence of institutional thinking, political action in Iran has always been in the shadow of violence and insecurity
کلیدواژهها English
