نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی مستقل
نویسنده
دانش آموخته دکتری روابط بین الملل دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
Realism is one of the dominant paradigms of international relations that has been widely used to analyze current events in international relations. One of the reasons for this is related to its assumptions applicable to current events in the international system, and the other reason is related to the ontological, epistemological and methodological foundations of this approach, which has a very strong analytical power for researchers in the field of global politics. These two issues have led to much criticism from other schools of international relations. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate and analyze the most important transnational critiques that have been introduced into this theory. In this regard, the question that arises is what are the biggest and most important criticisms within the paradigm and outside the paradigm that has been introduced into Waltz's theory of realism? In response, it is said that the most critical critique of Waltz's theory is the assumptions of Waltz's theory of realism, which include: the assumption of balance of power, the assumption of central government, the assumption of the systemic system and the assumption of its rationality. Extra-paradigmal critiques relate to the materialist, objective, and positivist foundations of this theory, which have been introduced by the current of reflection. The data collection method is library and internet information and the research method in this research is based on descriptive-analytical method.
کلیدواژهها English
