Evolution in the Concept of International Order

Bahadorkhani, Mohammadreza; Mohammadi Darabi, Aliasghar

Evolution in the Concept of International Order

Volume 1, Issue 3 - Serial Number 3
Winter 2018

Pages 89-117

Document Type : Original Independent Original Article

Authors

mohammadreza bahadorkhani ¹

aliasghar mohammadi darabi ²

¹ PhD student in International Relations, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran

² Graduated from Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The concept of international order in different theories of international relations has different definitions. Each of these theories, based on their ontological and epistemological concepts, provides a definition of international order. The paradigm of realism regards the balance of power and hegemony as the decisive and shaping elements of the international order, while the liberal paradigm considers the international order to be free from free markets, regimes, institutions and international organizations. On the one hand, the English school emphasizes the concepts of realism such as war, the balance of power and the management of great powers in shaping the international order, and on the other hand, it emphasizes the concepts of common norms and values in shaping the international order, and The international order is regarded as a kind of social fabric among the governments of nations. On the basis of these changes, the question that arises is how the concept of international order has evolved based on its constituent factors and scope. The hypothesis of this study is that in the evolution of the concept of international order its shaping factor has been extended to other actors in addition to states and its scope has been extended from great powers to other states and even pheromonal and human actors.

Keywords

International Order

Realism Theory

Realism

Liberalism and the English School

20.1001.1.25884565.1396.1.3.5.6

بلیس، جان و اسمیت، استیو (1388). جهانی‌شدن و نظم پس از جنگ سرد، در جهانی‌شدن سیاست: روابط بین‌الملل در عصر نوین، ترجمه ابوالقاسم راه چمنی و دیگران، چاپ دوم، تهران: موسسه فرهنگی مطالعات و تحقیقات بین‌المللی ابرار معاصر.

دهقانی فیروزآبادی، سیدجلال (1394). اصول و مبانی روابط بین‌الملل، جلد اول، تهران: سمت.

رضایی، علیرضا (1389). «الگوی روسیه از نظم در نظام بین‌الملل پسا جنگ سرد؛ نظم موازنه محور»، فصلنامه مطالعات سیاسی، سال دوم، شماره 7.

دیویتاک، ریچارد، دان، تیم (1390). نظم در دانشنامه روابط بین‌الملل، تهران: نشر نی.

لیتل، ریچارد (1389). تحول در نظریه‌های موازنه قوا، ترجمه غلامعلی چگنی زاده، تهران: موسسه فرهنگی مطالعات و تحقیقات بین‌المللی ابرار معاصر.

میرفخرائی، سید حسن (1385). «آنارشی و نظم از منظر نظریه‌های روابط بین‌الملل»، فصلنامه پژوهش‌های سیاسی، سال سوم، شماره 8.

Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1977.

Cox, Robert W, (1981) “Social Forces, States and World Order: Beyond International Relations Theory,” Millennium-Journal of International Studies.

Ikenberry, G. John “The Future of the Liberal World Order”

Ivaneishvili, Baia (2015), “Future of Liberal World Order Can Liberal World Order Prevail in the World without American Hegemony?” Journal of Social Sciences.

Keene, Edward (2002), “Beyond the Anarchical Society Grotius, Colonialism, and Order in World Politics,” Cambridge University Press.

Zhai, Haoyu (2015), “Does International Order Ultimately Rely on States and Military Power?” available at: http://www.e-ir.info/2015/04/22/does-international-order-ultimately-rely-on-states-and-military-power/

http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2015/Also-in-2015/deterrence-russia-military/EN/index.htm. Deterrence: what it can (and cannot) do.

………………….. “Theoretical Approaches to Conflict and Order in International Politics.

XML

PDF 626.47 K