Volume 7, Issue 4 , December 2023, , Pages 109-133
Abstract
One of the challenging issues after the Islamic revolution is the place of human knowledge and expertise in the administration of the Islamic system. Some consider jurisprudential management ...
Read More
One of the challenging issues after the Islamic revolution is the place of human knowledge and expertise in the administration of the Islamic system. Some consider jurisprudential management to be in contrast with scientific management, while others consider the consideration of society's interests and attention to human experience as the secularization of government. The purpose of this article is to explain the position of expertise in the administration of the Islamic system based on the methodology of jurisprudence with an emphasis on the opinions of Imam Khomeini (RA), and the claim of this article is that according to Imam Khomeini (RA), jurisprudential management is not in contrast with scientific management, and referring to reason and human experience in the administration of Islamic society does not mean the secularization of religion, but the necessity of Implementation of Sharia law.To prove this claim, first by describing the opinions of the Scholars of principles of jurisprudence regarding the authority of human knowledge in this field; Then, by examining the areas of administration of the Islamic society, we have analyzed the essentials of these basics in the administration of the Islamic system.
Methodological-theoretical debates have always been one of the most important topics in the field of science and epistemology; Because they draw the line between science and pseudo-science. ...
Read More
Methodological-theoretical debates have always been one of the most important topics in the field of science and epistemology; Because they draw the line between science and pseudo-science. Cohen, Lakatos, and Popper's efforts have been to analyze the enigma of science, thought, and thought, and have always dominated the construction of scientific and philosophical space. In this research, the author seeks to answer two combined questions from a comparative perspective: 1- What are the most important methodological-theoretical foundations and distinguishing features in the approach of Popper, Cohen and Lakatos? 2- While explaining the critiques of Popper, Cohen and Lakatosh's views, what are the practical results of each of them in the field of political science and knowledge? The results indicate that each of the intellectual-methodological systems, along with the shortcomings, have strengths, applications and explanations that can be useful in solving or answering some aspects of the methodological issues of political science and society crises and politics. Be. Also, creating space or creating a platform for conflict and method-competition competition is effective in achieving some relative rules, scientificization and methodization of political knowledge.
