Journal of Political Strategy

The performance of the United Nations Security Council, in the nuclear case of the Islamic Republic of Iran, before and after the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) is the subject ... Read More The performance of the United Nations Security Council, in the nuclear case of the Islamic Republic of Iran, before and after the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) is the subject of research by the participants and it is answered that the legal performance of the Security Council regarding the nuclear case of the Islamic Republic of Iran, before And how was it after the JCPOA and how are its effects and legal loopholes explained? According to the United Nations Charter, the Security Council is the most important pillar of the United Nations in safeguarding international security and peace. Before the JCPOA agreement, the Security Council approved crippling sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran by approving six resolutions, and after the JCPOA agreement, it approved Resolution 2231 and formalized the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) as an appendix to the aforementioned resolution. He forgave and canceled all his previous resolutions with this action. Therefore, this researcher aims to first determine which of the situations against international security and peace regarding the nuclear activity of the Islamic Republic of Iran was exemplified under the seventh chapter of the United Nations Charter, when the case was referred to the Security Council and the aforementioned resolutions were issued. Secondly, how and on what basis has the legal performance of the Security Council regarding the nuclear case of the Islamic Republic of Iran been after the agreement on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and the approval of Resolution 2231. Thirdly, what shortcomings, ambiguities and controversial points did the above-mentioned agreement contain, which created the ground for the withdrawal of the United States of America as the main negotiating party from the JCPOA, and as a result, the withdrawal of the United States of America from the JCPOA collapsed based on the JCPOA agreement. Iran's diplomatic efforts to resolve the propaganda concerns of the West, especially the United States of America, against peaceful nuclear activities by actively participating in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) negotiations, finally by changing the presidency and transferring power from the Democrats to the Republicans, and the U.S. foreign policy turn America has practically prepared the ground for the escalation of hostilities and threats to international peace and security with the unilateral withdrawal of the United States of America from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and the status of this international multilateral agreement has been left in an aura of ambiguity and impasse until now.

Designing Iran's supernatural nuclear energy model by systematically reviewing previous studies

sonaz nasiri

Volume 3, Issue 9 , September 2019, , Pages 155-182

Abstract

Analyzing the level of demand and energy supply in the world, paying attention to the process of depleting fossil resources in the coming decades and the environmental benefits of nuclear ... Read More

The Impact of Peaceful Iranian Nuclear Energy Activities on Persian Gulf Security

majid bozorgmehri; seyed mahdi tabatabaee

Volume 2, Issue 4 , June 2018, , Pages 1-37

Abstract

The Gulf region is important from the economic, cultural, political and security aspects. The junction between East and West and having the Strait of Hormuz has given this region a ... Read More The Gulf region is important from the economic, cultural, political and security aspects. The junction between East and West and having the Strait of Hormuz has given this region a particular geopolitical position. Iran's energy reserves and peaceful nuclear activities have made security in the region a global focus. In this regard, the question of the present article is what effect has peaceful Iranian nuclear activities had on the security of the Persian Gulf region? The hypothesis is that, since Iran's nuclear activities appear likely to alter security and balance in its favor in the region, most Gulf states have sought to keep pace with policy. The United States has shown these activities to be non-peaceful and military and thus pose a serious threat to regional security. And seek to halt Iran's nuclear activities. It will be seen that after the Iran-5 + 1 agreement, the security view of the members of the GCC, as the largest organization in the region, has not changed significantly on the Iranian nuclear issue, and these countries still believe that Iran wants to These actions undermine the balance of power in their favor in the region. The present paper attempts to address the issue with a generalist approach to realism and Morgentha's theory of balance. The research method of this article is descriptive-analytical and data collection is by library method. The Gulf region is important from the economic, cultural, political and security aspects. The junction between East and West and having the Strait of Hormuz has given this region a particular geopolitical position. Iran's energy reserves and peaceful nuclear activities have made security in the region a global focus. In this regard, the question of the present article is what effect has peaceful Iranian nuclear activities had on the security of the Persian Gulf region? The hypothesis is that, since Iran's nuclear activities appear likely to alter security and balance in its favor in the region, most Gulf states have sought to keep pace with policy. The United States has shown these activities to be non-peaceful and military and thus pose a serious threat to regional security. And seek to halt Iran's nuclear activities. It will be seen that after the Iran-5 + 1 agreement, the security view of the members of the GCC, as the largest organization in the region, has not changed significantly on the Iranian nuclear issue, and these countries still believe that Iran wants to These actions undermine the balance of power in their favor in the region. The present paper attempts to address the issue with a generalist approach to realism and Morgentha's theory of balance. The research method of this article is descriptive-analytical and data collection is by library method.

Journal of Political Strategy

Articles in Press

Current Issue

Volume 8 (2024)

Volume 7 (2023)

Volume 6 (2022)

Volume 5 (2021)

Volume 4 (2020-2021)

Volume 3 (2019-2020)

Volume 2 (2018-2019)

Volume 1 (2017-2018)

Keywords = Nuclear Energy

Legal analysis of the performance of the United Nations Security Council in the nuclear case of the Islamic Republic of Iran, before and after the JCPOA

Abstract

Designing Iran's supernatural nuclear energy model by systematically reviewing previous studies

Abstract

The Impact of Peaceful Iranian Nuclear Energy Activities on Persian Gulf Security

Abstract