Discourse Space, Iranian Ideology and Its Rule on Foreign Policy Discourse of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the Middle East
Mohammad Hassan
Shaykh al-Islami
Assistant Professor of International Relations Faculty of International Relations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Tehran, Iran
author
Mokhtar
Rahimi
M.Sc. Student of Regional Studies Middle East, Faculty of International Relations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Tehran, Iran
author
Ali
Gasemi Fard
Master's Degree Student in Diplomacy and International Organizations, Faculty of International Relations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Tehran, Iran
author
text
article
2017
per
Discourse is a system of interrelated meanings in which a set of signs are structured as a whole and their meanings are consolidated and social practices are formed. The interaction of "self" and "other" over constructed and reality becomes meaningful and understandable. Terrorism is one of the vague words in the international arena, which, because of the complexity of the concept and its implications, face a kind of crisis of meaning in defining and redefining territory. Definitions of terrorism and its dimensions appear to be derived from discursive and propaganda constructs rather than conformity with the objectivity and acceptance of the value / reality dualism. The article seeks to answer the question of what are the most important factors of the Islamic Republic of Iran's foreign policy in the Middle East. The present study investigates the Iranian discourse, ideals and myths and their impact on the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. In order to achieve this goal, the relationship between discourse and foreign policy is briefly discussed first. In this section, while illustrating how this discourse was formed and shaped, it is stated that the discourse establishes a new Islamic-Iranian identity, thereby defining its national goals and interests based on Islamic identity and revolutionary discourse in the Middle East.
Journal of Political Strategy
Seyed Mohammad Reza Mousavi Phd(with the participation of the Iranian Scientific Association of International Security)
2588-4565
1
v.
1
no.
2017
1
20
https://www.rahbordsyasi.ir/article_110331_3c8bdb6bfc8ec5945f1f95e966a64caa.pdf
Drug Restrictions Due to International Economic Sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran and Violation of International Human Rights Standards
seyed ali
sadat akhavi
Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
author
Ruhollah
Maleki Azinabadi
PhD student in International Relations, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
author
text
article
2017
per
With the outbreak of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, US sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran have been one of the main features of US foreign policy against Iran; But UN and other world sanctions against Iran in recent years have affected all aspects of Iranian life in different ways. In other words, the restrictions imposed by the sanctions on banking, transportation, insurance, trade, international transactions and investments have created many difficulties for Iran and have had a major impact on the country's economy. In this regard, the health care system is not safe from the bite of sanctions and has endangered the lives of many patients, so the article assumes that drug restrictions resulting from international economic sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran cause gross violations. International human rights standards in the field of health and treatment.
Journal of Political Strategy
Seyed Mohammad Reza Mousavi Phd(with the participation of the Iranian Scientific Association of International Security)
2588-4565
1
v.
1
no.
2017
21
46
https://www.rahbordsyasi.ir/article_113105_ce97567271c676b84dbe0a3a016dd729.pdf
Turkey's position in EU foreign policy during Erdogan's two terms before and after the coup
alireza
mohammadkhani
Assistant Professor of International Relations, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan Branch, Zanjan, Iran
author
rasool
hasanlo
Master student of International Relations, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan Branch, Zanjan, Iran
author
text
article
2017
per
One of Turkey's most important goals in recent years has been to join the European Union. Membership in this union brings many benefits to countries. On the other hand, the developed European countries also intend to increase their political and economic influence in the world with the border development of the European Union, and on the other hand, they enumerate the problems and difficulties in order for Turkey to join the European Union. Turkey has made major reforms in recent years to accept its membership in the European Union. Accordingly, and as a result of the implementation of these reforms, we are witnessing a decrease in the role of the military and a change in the rights of minorities and more respect for human rights in this country, which after the reforms by the Turkish government we have seen a positive trend in negotiations. Since the 2016 coup and Erdogan's actions against the coup, Europeans have changed their minds about the Turkish government, and the growing process of negotiations between the union and Turkey to join the union has faced major problems. In this regard, this article uses the theory of convergence to answer the question of whether Turkey's position in EU foreign policy has changed after the coup? Based on this, the article hypothesizes that Turkey's position in EU foreign policy after the 2016 coup seems to be in a good position for reasons such as human rights, the Turkish government's pessimistic view of Europe and the problem of immigrants before the coup. Not be. The research method is based on descriptive-analytical research strategy.
Journal of Political Strategy
Seyed Mohammad Reza Mousavi Phd(with the participation of the Iranian Scientific Association of International Security)
2588-4565
1
v.
1
no.
2017
47
79
https://www.rahbordsyasi.ir/article_113100_e07bf6d0841a01c5ed05df319dd44fe6.pdf
The effects and consequences of the presence and emergence of extremist groups in the security developments in West Asia in the context of globalization (with emphasis on ISIL)
mosen
dyanat
Assistant Professor of Political Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
author
hamed
roshan cheshm
PhD student in Political Science, majoring in Political Sociology, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
author
text
article
2017
per
The growth of the extremist group in West Asia indicates a new development in regional relations and regional security equations. The formation of ISIS and its expansion in various dimensions show that regional security issues have moved out of their traditional and intergovernmental state and have taken on a sub-governmental and supra-governmental scope. Apart from this issue, in looking at the phenomenon of ISIL and regional developments, we see ISIL taking advantage of the process of globalization in the formation of regions and the absorption of trans-regional forces. In addition to the propaganda aspect, this process also includes ideological and self-awareness dimensions. The purpose of this study is to investigate and demonstrate the evolution of security issues resulting from the spread of terrorist groups. The main question of the research is what effects and consequences have occurred in the security issues of the West Asian region due to the formation of ISIL in the process of globalization. The research hypothesis indicates that the formation and independence of the ISIL group due to the process of globalization has led to the transformation of inter-governmental security issues into trans-state threats in the West Asian region. This study, using a descriptive-analytical method along with the use of authentic documents and texts, indicates that ISIL, by using the developments in the field of communication technology and the ideological effects of globalization, causes a change in regional security issues towards the formation of case groups. It has become sub-governmental and extra-governmental and the role of governments has been reduced.
Journal of Political Strategy
Seyed Mohammad Reza Mousavi Phd(with the participation of the Iranian Scientific Association of International Security)
2588-4565
1
v.
1
no.
2017
81
118
https://www.rahbordsyasi.ir/article_113101_4084deb693c40b15064014b513cf04bd.pdf
The Impact of Regional Developments and the Rentier Government on the Political Culture of the Saudi People
hamid
salehi
Associate Professor of Political Science, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran
author
hosein
norouzi amiri
Master of Regional Studies in Persian Gulf, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran
author
text
article
2017
per
Throughout history, most of the governments that have come to power in the Arabian Peninsula have defined the ruling relationship with the people as a master-slave relationship and did not give the least rights to the citizens (subjects) in order to maintain power and maintain their position. In general, it can be said that the political culture of the Saudi people was a limited political culture, but with the developments that took place in the 1970s and 1990s, Saudi society moved towards a subordinate political culture. In this article, the author intends to examine the impact of regional developments on the political culture of the Saudi people using the model of Almond and his colleagues, considering that no proper research has been done on the political culture of the Saudi people in Iran to date. The hypothesis of the present study is that the developments that took place in the region in the 1970s, 1990s and 2003 caused a rapid change in oil prices, which led to extensive economic and social changes due to the rent-seeking of the Saudi government, and ultimately changed the political culture of the Saudi people. From limited level to subordinate.
Journal of Political Strategy
Seyed Mohammad Reza Mousavi Phd(with the participation of the Iranian Scientific Association of International Security)
2588-4565
1
v.
1
no.
2017
119
139
https://www.rahbordsyasi.ir/article_113102_1827d1347217e457c73f1674655ca791.pdf
A Reflection on the US Strategy for the Islamic Awakening in the Middle East from the Perspective of International Law
jafar
heydargholizade
PhD Student in Public International Law, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Isfahan, Iran
author
jamal
beigi
Assistant Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Maragheh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Maragheh, Iran
author
text
article
2017
per
Islamic Awakening is a phenomenon that was introduced at the same time with the West's invasion of the Islamic world and the colonial era, and has reached its peak as a phenomenon influenced by the intellectual movement of the Islamic Republic of Iran today in the form of a social movement in the Middle East and North Africa. . So that means following the Islamic teachings that originated in Islamic Iran and spread to the countries of the Persian Gulf and the Middle East from Egypt and Bahrain. The main purpose of this article is to examine the Islamic Awakening and the strategy of the United States in Iran, Egypt and Bahrain. Our argument will be that the US government, by implementing its strategy in this region; That is, the embargo of the Islamic Republic of Iran after the revolution, which is in some way contrary to the standards of human rights and international law, also tried to change the revolution in Egypt and secularize the government with a coup interfered in the internal affairs of that country. It goes without saying that it has not neglected to implement its policies in the Middle East, including Bahrain, and by supporting the Al Khalifa regime, it has supported a kind of state terrorism of this regime, all of which the US states are contrary to international law.
Journal of Political Strategy
Seyed Mohammad Reza Mousavi Phd(with the participation of the Iranian Scientific Association of International Security)
2588-4565
1
v.
1
no.
2017
141
157
https://www.rahbordsyasi.ir/article_113103_ff3dda0f320b803c851487a09cfe2db0.pdf
The effect of the accessionism of the GCC countries on relations with Iran
masoud
motallebi
Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Azadshahr Branch, Azadshahr, Iran
author
seyed mohammadreza
mousavi
PhD Student in Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
author
edris
salari
PhD Student in Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan Branch, Zanjan, Iran
author
text
article
2017
per
One of the important theories in the field of international relations is neorealism, which, considering the material structure of the international system, analyzes the behavior of countries in the international system and considers the balance of power as the main factor in this analysis. But among neorealists, Stephen Walt points to a point that contrasts with the balance of power. For the first time in the collection of neorealist thinkers, Walt introduces immaterial factors in the analysis of behavior in the form of threats. According to him, the increase of power should be manifested in the form of threat and mere increase of power does not mean threat, but the mental perception of the threat is important and analyzes the behavior of a country if it is considered a threat in the form of annexationist strategy. Contrary to the balance of power and the unity of different countries, in order to avoid the threat, in this approach, the target country turns to annexation or relying on a superior power. In this study, we examine the accession of the Persian Gulf countries (Cooperation Council) to the United States as a supra-regional power over the perception of Iran as a threat and the impact of this strategy on bilateral relations.
Journal of Political Strategy
Seyed Mohammad Reza Mousavi Phd(with the participation of the Iranian Scientific Association of International Security)
2588-4565
1
v.
1
no.
2017
159
182
https://www.rahbordsyasi.ir/article_113104_4731f3b334cb131b651e315051e52028.pdf